|
Scarica
l'articolo in PDF
Peccoud.
D. (ed.)
Philosophical and
Spiritual perspectives on Decent work
Geneva, International Labour Office, 2004, pp.
Jim Alford
With the advent of globalisation this book is
clearly very timely and important. One wonders if the English word
"Decent" in the title is strong enough, though it has the advantage of
not being commonly used in this context, and is not easy to replace.
Alternatives might be "Just", "Ethical", "Moral", even "Theological".
The phrase 'recovering the spiritual dimension of work' might be
useful. At any rate, the 'Decent Work Agenda' resulted from a one year
consultation and a seminar in Geneva (Feb. 2002). This was achieved by
cooperation between the ILO and the WCC. Communities the participants
belonged to included Judaism, Christianity and Islam, Hinduism and
Buddhism, Confucianism, Humanism and Atheism. Part I discusses the
issues at stake; Part II presents a synthesis of the common points of
view; Part III presents opinions of participants in separate articles
relating to local issues, philosophical views of economic and human
rights issues and finally papers connected with specific traditions.
In Part I, Juan Somavia insists that it is absolutely essential that
the world becomes aware of the importance of values, ethics and
spiritual references in politics, human rights and social issues, with
poverty and social exclusion being the dominant problems. But in a UN
Summit on Social Questions (1995), the spiritual dimension of these
issues was largely ignored, hence the need for this 'Decent Work
Agenda' (DWA). Konrad Raiser then looks at the dialogue between
cultures and the DWA. He calls for the formulation of a 'global ethic'
lifting out compatible core values from the different religious and
cultural traditions. Religions with an exclusive claim to truth will
have to learn to live with plurality.
In Part II, three paradigms of human work are discussed. In the
'Material Paradigm' the worth of a human being is measured in terms of
profit or as a consumer. The 'Neo-Human Paradigm, despite the
inclusion of human rights, still has the material paradigm as the main
frame of reference. It is with the 'Holistic' paradigm that the
spiritual dimension of these issues is recognised. In this holistic
agenda, the worker is entitled to BE someone, whereas in the material
paradigm he/she is entitled only to HAVE something. The links between
work and various theologies are explored, with emphasis on the
positive view of work which sees God as the archetypal worker. The
traditional caste system would be an example of the negative scenario.
Work has a solidarity dimension as a link between the individual and
society, so work is at the root of community. There is a profound
study of work with relation to all the major spiritual traditions.
In Part III an array of authoritative experts have been assembled from
the communities listed above. They were asked to produce a written
contribution (2000 words), taking into account a series of issues
relevant to DWA. These articles show a most interesting insight into
the response of these faith communities to the DWA. A Brazilian
reflection is a moving analysis of a typical South American situation.
In India, a contributor admits that the National Movement for Freedom
has resulted in only minimal erosion of caste and gender inequality.
The whole situation exposed engenders both depression and anger. India
has the largest number of people in forced labour and in bonded and
child labour. The chapter on Reformed Protestant and Presbyterian
churches does read as though they are solely responsible for all the
progress on work. One thought triumphalism was a weakness of
conservative and fundamentalist Catholics! The Protestant contribution
does admit some drawbacks in the Protestant traditions. No doubt
feminists might find some in the Catholic traditions. Clearly this
area must be an essential component of interfaith dialogue, if it is
to get beyond social pleasantries. A proposal to form a Permanent
Forum on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is discussed. The
implementation of economic, social and cultural rights requires a more
coordinated effort at the local, national and global level. This book
is an essential read for those involved in the social sciences and
interfaith matters.
Scarica
l'articolo in PDF
|